Greedy Algorithm to find the maximum number of mutually compatible jobs. In the video the following concepts are. Greedy algorithms are mainly applied tooptimization problems: Given as input a set S of elements, and a function f : S !R,. Consider jobs in some natural order. Show the trace of running a bottom-up (i. Interval Scheduling: Greedy Algorithms Greedy template. Input String: test Smallest Word: test Largest Word: test ----- Input String: This problem is solved at the Algorithms tutorial horizon Smallest Word: is Largest Word: Algorithms Approach: Do a single traversal and keep track of the longest ad smallest words using word lengths. Theorem: Algorithm A correctly solves this problem. This becomes exactly the same as the original problem if we imagine time running in reverse, so it produces an optimal solution for essentially the same reasons. Interval Scheduling: Greedy Algorithm Greedy algorithm. Take each job provided it's compatible with the ones already taken. (b) Using the \greedy stays ahead" approach that we used for the Interval Scheduling greedy algorithm proof, prove that your algorithm indeed produces an optimal solu-tion. Mininium Spanning Trees. We know that the right end of J is not before the right end of I. Mathematical induction (contd. Our focus is on offline problems, because multi-interval power saving and even one-interval gap scheduling are. 1 answer below » Suppose that instead of always selecting the first activity to finish, we instead select the last activity to start that is compatible with all previously selected activities. optimally by a natural matroid greedy algorithm extension. (Problem 2 reduces to Problem 1 when all intervals have the same duration. Consider jobs in increasing order of finish time. Step 2: Find a. 2 Scheduling to Minimize Lateness: An Exchange Argument 4. Design and Analysis of Algorithms - Approximate Syllabus Computer Science 4020. Greedy Algorithms: Interval scheduling Ch. An algorithm can be greedy even if it doesn't produce an optimal solution Example: Interval Scheduling Interval scheduling is a classic algorithmic problem. Show the trace of running a bottom-up (i. rì Let j1, j2, jm denote set of jobs in an optimal. In such problems, the objective is to nd a minimum-cost schedule in which all j obs are scheduled. 2017 Jun 19;56(4):1389-1413. Interval Scheduling Algorithm. 1 of Textbook Greedy Algorithm Notes, Section 2 Friday No lecture due to instructor illness Finish reading either 4. (25) [Weighted Interval Scheduling: algorithm tracing] Consider the dynamic programming algorithm we discussed for the weighted interval scheduling problem. In both cases, assume that ties are broken arbitrarily. Greedy Interval Scheduling Step 1:Identify a greedy choice property Interval Scheduling Algorithm 31 Find event ending earliest, add to solution, Remove itandall conflicting events, Repeat until all events removed, return solution. , iterative) implementation of the algorithm on the problem instance shown below. Greedy algorithm. It is hard to define what greedy algorithm is. •Observation. Various things seem like they might be plausible. Therefore, for each r, the r thinterval the ALG selects nishes no later than the r interval in OPT. Question: 2. 2 Interval scheduling /Activity Selection To be complete, a greedy correctness proof has three parts: 1. List of problems we considered: interval scheduling, scheduling with deadlines and pro ts, 1/2. Greedy Algorithm to find the maximum number of mutually compatible jobs. Stable Matching and Interval Scheduling Arash Ra ey May 7, 2014 Read the proof of the two theorems in the previous slide. Therefore, for each r, the r thinterval the ALG selects nishes no later than the r interval in OPT. An optimization problem can be solved using Greedy if the problem has the following property: At every step, we can make a choice that looks best at the moment, and we get the optimal solution of the complete problem. To make it linear, one would have to do something about sorting, such use using radix sort, which can be considered linear for practical purposes. Minimizing Maximum Lateness: Greedy Algorithm Greedy algorithm. Lecture 6: Greedy algorithms 6. Slides for this week: we will continue with slides posted last week, then we'll get to the Greedy algorithms vs Dynamic programming: Interval Scheduling and Longest Increasing Subsequence - pdf Tuesday, Sept 26. Initialize A = ; 3. Greedy algorithm is optimal. Greedy Algorithms Greedy #1: Activity-Selection / Interval Scheduling Greedy #2: Coin Changing Greedy #3: Fractional Knapsack Problem Greedy #4: Breakpoint Selection Greedy #5: Huffman Codes Greedy #6: Scheduling to Minimize Lateness Greedy #7: Task-Scheduling 2. In designing greedy algorithm, art is in choice of selection. Set of jobs with start times, finish times, and weights. Our algorithm will continue to run these steps until the input set is empty. (by contradiction) Assume greedy is not optimal, and let's see what happens. Repeatedly consider an interval with highest credit, add it to the solution and delete it and all other intervals that overlap with it from the set of intervals being processed. Tell us what form your greedy solution takes, and what form some other solution takes (possibly the optimal solution). Show the trace of running a bottom-up (i. counterexample for earliest start time counterexample for shortest interval counterexample for fewest. When trying to figure out a greedy algorithm for the interval scheduling problem of section 4. Weighted interval scheduling by dynamic programming. Dynamic Programming: In this lecture we begin our coverage of an important algorithm design technique, called dynamic programming (or DP for short). Introduction to optimization problems and greedy algorithms. We will now consider a gen-eralization of this problem, where instead of being unit-length, each job now has a duration (or processing. Classical Iterated Greedy. The greedy algorithm selects the available interval with smallest nish time; since interval j r is one of these available intervals, we have f(i r) f(j r). This document outlines a strategy for designing greedy algorithms and proving their optimality. Also, if another user wants to schedule an appointment at 3:30PM and the service duration more than 30 minutes, they shouldn't be able to do that. Although easy to devise, greedy algorithms can be hard to analyze. Randomized Algorithms: This class includes any algorithm that uses a random number at any point during its process. greedy 3-approximation algorithm (Feige et al. Module 3: Greedy : Interval scheduling Module 4: Greedy : Proof strategies Module 5: Greedy : Huffman coding Module 6: Dynamic Programming: weighted interval scheduling Assignments MCQ/Fill in blanks, programming assignment Week 7 Module 1: Dynamic Programming: memoization Module 2: Dynamic Programming: edit distance. Greedy Interval Scheduling Interval Scheduling Algorithm Find event ending earliest, add to solution, cs4102_L16_greedyCoinIntervals Created Date:. Show the trace of running a bottom-up (i. [Earliest finish time] Consider jobs in ascending order of f j. 3 Greedy Algorithms interval scheduling a greedy algorithm the interval partitioning problem CS 401/MCS 401 Lecture 5 Computer Algorithms I Jan Verschelde, 27 June 2018 Computer Algorithms I (CS 401/MCS 401) Directed Graphs; Interval Scheduling L-5 27 June 2018 1 / 57. Figure 1: The interval-scheduling problem is to select a maximal set of non-overlapping intervals. Slides Chapter 4. Greedy algorithm is optimal. For example, let A be the solution con-structed by the greedy algorithm, and let O be a (possibly optimal) solution. Greedy Algorithm Proof. Following are some standard algorithms that are Greedy algorithms. Remove x, and all intervals intersecting x, and all intervals in the same group of x, from the set of candidate intervals. Observation. Show the trace of running a bottom-up (i. 2017 Jun 19;56(4):1389-1413. Greedy Algorithms. Greedy algorithm never schedules two incompatible lectures in the same classroom. For exam-ple, let A be the solution constructed by the greedy algorithm, and let O be a. Initialize B = ;, and sort S in decreasing order by weight. (b) Using the \greedy stays ahead" approach that we used for the Interval Scheduling greedy algorithm proof, prove that your algorithm indeed produces an optimal solu-tion. In [4], maximal scheduling was proposed as a low (linear) complexity algorithm for wireless networks. The correctness is often established via proof by contradiction. Randomized Algorithms: This class includes any algorithm that uses a random number at any point during its process. Let d = number of classrooms that the greedy algorithm allocates. Greedy algorithm never schedules two incompatible lectures in the same classroom. Recommended: Please try your approach on {IDE} first, before moving on to the solution. For example, intvs = [[1,3], [2,4], [3,6]], the interval set have 2 subsets without any overlapping at most, [[1,3], [3,6]], so your algorithm should return 2 as the result. It is hard to define what greedy algorithm is. return A as the maximum set of scheduled intervals 1. 3 Greedy Algorithms interval scheduling a greedy algorithm the interval partitioning problem CS 401/MCS 401 Lecture 5 Computer Algorithms I Jan Verschelde, 27 June 2018 Computer Algorithms I (CS 401/MCS 401) Directed Graphs; Interval Scheduling L-5 27 June 2018 1 / 57. Priority Based Scheduling. Assume greedy is different from OPT. The algorithm has two phases. Solutions for finding the Closest Pair of Points 6. Proof:(by contradiction). CS3000:&Algorithms&&&Data JonathanUllman Lecture&18:& • Greedy&Algorithms:&Proof&Techniques March&30,2020. This is obviously true for k = 1, since the algorithm chooses the task with the lowest finish time. Interval scheduling, unclear greedy proof. First, we will learn what is interval scheduling algorithm. 2017 Jun 19;56(4):1389-1413. 1 (PDF) Sketch of The Proof That The "Schedule All Intervals" Algorithm of Section 4. Some formalization and notation to express the proof. Greedy Graphs 5. Divide-and-conquer techniques 5. Greedy Algorithms (10) Dynamic Programming (18) Backtracking/DFS/BFS (2) Branch & Bound (5) Graph Theory (9) NP-Completeness (7) Artificial Intelligence (12. Interval Scheduling: Correctness. (b) Using the \greedy stays ahead" approach that we used for the Interval Scheduling greedy algorithm proof, prove that your algorithm indeed produces an optimal solu-tion. Consider jobs in some natural order. These problems are referred to as interval scheduling with requir ed jobs (see Subsection 3. Series-parallel network flows can be solved by the same natural greedy algorithm which can be viewed as a combinatorial gradiant method. Greedy algorithm works if all weights are 1. (25) [Weighted Interval Scheduling: algorithm tracing] Consider the dynamic programming algorithm we discussed for the weighted interval scheduling problem. In maximal scheduling, the only constraint is that the scheduled set of links is maximal, i. 2 Interval Scheduling 2. ・Consider jobs in ascending order of finish time. Let 1, 2,… denote the set of jobs selected by greedy. For example, let A be the solution con-structed by the greedy algorithm, and let O be a (possibly optimal) solution. Here is the following Question I was stuck in proving Proof of Correctness for the following variant of the standard Activity Selection problem. Python & Java Projects for $40 - $60. List of problems we considered: interval scheduling, scheduling with deadlines and pro ts, 1/2. The SDVSP with multiple vehicle types is formulated as a non-preemptive online multiprocessor-task fixed interval scheduling model. To schedule number of intervals on to particular resource, take care that no two intervals are no overlapping, that is to say second interval cannot be scheduled while first is running. 1) • Greedy algorithms do not always guarantee optimal solution. There is a Θ(n log n) implementation and the interested reader may continue reading below (Java Example). Randomized Algorithms: This class includes any algorithm that uses a random number at any point during its process. Lectures {"#,%#} §Output. Greedy Algorithms Interval Scheduling: The Greedy Algorithm Stays Ahead Scheduling to Minimize Lateness: An Exchange Argument Optimal Caching: A More Complex Exchange Argument Shortest Paths in a Graph 137 The Minimum Spanning Tree ProbJem 142 Implementing Kruskal’s Algorithm: The Union-Find Data Structure 151 Clustering 157. Proof:(by contradiction). 7 Clustering 5. The proof that I am referencing is here: Greedy Algorithm Proof I don't understand how the proof tells us to make the the problem smaller and smaller, iteratively to select the first element, see whats left, then select the first element of the new set, see what's left, and so on. Interval Scheduling: Correctness Theorem. Average Wait Time: (0 + 4 + 12 + 5)/4 = 21 / 4 = 5. Observe that scheduling the jobs within an interval is an instance of the special case of our problem where all release and due dates are identical and the Gonzalez- Sahni algorithm (1979) solves this problem in O(m log m + n) operations. A Polyhedral Approach to Single-Machine Scheduling Problems J. Shortest Path 14 Weighted Interval Scheduling 22 The set of pairs returned by the Gale-Shapley algorithm is a stable matching. Interval Scheduling: Greedy Algorithm Interval Scheduling: Analysis • Theorem. The algorithm tries all possible gaps and chooses the largest gap that still leaves a feasible schedule (whose existence can be checked by maximum-cardinality. Consider tasks in some order. The Bellman-Ford algorithm, correctness, and analysis. So, step by step, the greedy is doing at least as well as the optimal, so in the end, we can’t lose. This completes the induction step. Classroom (interval) scheduling problem modify greedy algorithm to optimize #classes/classroom/day Karen Hignett Aug 9, 2017 8:28 AM I have a list of courses with a unique id in rows. In greedy algorithm approach, decisions are made from the given solution domain. Interval partitioning problem. 4 Greedy Algorithms 4. Observation. Greedy algorithm can fail spectacularly if arbitrary. Greedy Algorithm to find the maximum number of mutually compatible jobs. Add I to S. Since j k is compatible with j. Dijkstra's algorithm. 23/07/19 --4. The Greedy Algorithm Stays Ahead Lemma: FindSchedule finds a maximum-cardinality set of conflict-free intervals. Proof: Let the universe U contain n points, and suppose that the optimal. , iterative) implementation of the algorithm on the problem instance shown below. Lecture Notes 2 An Algorithm for Interval Scheduling A naive algorithm would examine all subsets of the given set of intervals and therefore run in O(n2n) time. Pure greedy algorithms Orthogonal greedy algorithms Relaxed greedy algorithms III. Interval Scheduling: Greedy Algorithms Greedy template. There are some standard greedy algorithms that people frequently use, often without even thinking of them as greedy. Show the order in which the algorithm selects the intervals, and also show a higher-weight subset of non-overlapping intervals than the subset output by the greedy algorithm. Sort intervals by starting time so that s 1 ≤ s 2. optimally by a natural matroid greedy algorithm extension. Viewed 374 times 0 $\begingroup$ I am having trouble understanding the proof of the theorem, which states that the greedy scheduling algorithm produces solutions of maximum size for the scheduling problem. Another Worked Example - with Priority Queue - of The "Schedule All Intervals" Algorithm of Section 4. From the lemma we know that f i k f j k. Initialize A = ; 3. This greedy algorithm selects shorter requests first and adds it to the solution if it doesn't overlap with the. Proof the Claim. Scheduling Chap4 The Greedy Approach Fall 2019 51 Multiple Server Scheduling from CS 1102 at Soongsil University. This is a contradiction. Lemma 1: The greedy algorithm always finds a path from the start lilypad to the destination lilypad. Describe how this approach is a greedy algorithm, and prove that it yields an optimal solution. Let's see what's different. - Let j 1, j 2, j m denote set of jobs in the optimal solution with i 1 = j. How to write Greedy Stays Ahead Proofs and Greedy Exchange Proofs: Exam due Friday Exam 1 FAQ. For the induction hypothesis, assume that f(i k-1) ≤ f(j k-1). Take each job provided it's compatible with the ones already taken. Scheduling Jobs With Deadlines, Profits, and Durations In the notes on Greedy Algorithms, we saw an efficient greedy algorithm for the problem of scheduling unit-length jobs which have deadlines and profits. Problem Statement. Definition : This algorithm consists of a set of tasks and each task is represented by a set of time intervals in which it describes the time in which it needs to be executed. ・ Consider jobs in ascending order of finish time. I've been following Greedy algorithms in the textbook Jeff Erickson. The course requires basic knowledge in algorithms and data structures as covered by the introductory course "Grundzüge von Algorithmen und Datenstrukturen". 8 weight = 999 weight = 1 time. In this paper, we break. Indeed, if intervals have equal length, then the more intervals we are able to select the higher is our total weight. We will now consider a gen-eralization of this problem, where instead of being unit-length, each job now has a duration (or processing. Question 3 (6pt) In class we discussed an greedy algorithm for Interval Scheduling that works. Give an example of weighted interval scheduling with at least 5 intervals where this greedy algorithm fails. Design and analysis of algorithms Facebook. Question: (a) Consider The Weighted Interval Scheduling Problem. Greedy Algorithms: Textbook Section 4. Show the order in which the algorithm selects the intervals, and also show a larger subset of non-overlapping intervals than the subset output by the greedy algorithm. Provide an example in tabular form with at least 5 tasks where this algorithm fails. This document outlines a strategy for designing greedy algorithms and proving their optimality. Observation. Prove that there exists an optimal solution which contains the rst greedy choice. What is the minimum number of bits to store the compressed database? ~250 M bits or 30MB. For example, the greedy algorithm where we pick greedily by earliest nishing time does work if all values are 1, but works very poorly with arbitrary values:. Observation. Interval Scheduling Theorem (Greedy-choice property): The interval having earliest finish time (first interval) will always be part of some optimal solution set. The Bellman-Ford algorithm, correctness, and analysis. Greedy algorithm is optimal. counterexample for earliest start timecounterexample for shortest interval 11 Greedy algorithms I: quiz 2 Interval scheduling: earliest-Þnish-time-Þrst algorithm ARLIEST Proposition. Adjust the algorithm Greedy* from the lecture appropriately and, just as in the lecture, prove using induction that it yields an optimal solution. Greedy Interval Scheduling greedyIntervalSchedule(s, f) { // schedule tasks with given start/finish times sort tasks by increasing order of finish times S = empty // S holds the sequence of scheduled activities prev_finish = -infinity // finish time of previous task for (i = 1 to n) { if (s[i] > prev_finish) { // task i doesn’t conflict with previous? append task i to S //add it to the schedule prev_finish = f[i] //and update the previous finish time } } return S }. Interval Scheduling. dist correct by induction, so s – y path already longer than s – v since algorithm chose latter April 15, 2014 CS38 Lecture 5 Dijkstra’s algorithm •We proved: time algorithm that is given –using binary heaps f. 2-approximation algorithms for the problem of interval schedul-ing with bounded parallelism based on the work of Alicherry et al. The Greedy Algorithm Stays Ahead Lemma: FindSchedule nds a maximum-cardinality set of con ict-free intervals. Interval SchedulingInterval PartitioningMinimising Lateness Ideas for Analysing the EFT Algorithm I We need to prove that jAj(the number of jobs in A) is the largest possible in any set of mutually compatible jobs. Problem: Interval Scheduling (Sec 4. The implementation of the algorithm is clearly in Θ(n^2). optimally by a natural matroid greedy algorithm extension. Remove x, and all intervals intersecting x, and all intervals in the same group of x, from the set of candidate intervals. Assume the resource can be used by at most one person at a time. counterexample for earliest start time counterexample for shortest interval counterexample for fewest conflicts. , a n] where each activity has start time s i and a finish time f i. CSI 604 { Spring 2016 Greedy Algorithms for Interval Scheduling I. Consider jobs in increasing order of finish time. Scheduling Chap4 The Greedy Approach Fall 2019 51 Multiple Server Scheduling from CS 1102 at Soongsil University. Take each job provided it's compatible with the ones already taken. Solutions for finding the Closest Pair of Points 6. Transportation problems, Monge sequences and greedy algorithms. Proof techniques, Induction, Summations, basic algorithms on numbers, complexity classes, Searching and Sorting, Asymptotic analysis , Divide-and-conquer: merge-sort, closest pair problems, collaborative filtering, Karatsuba algorithm, deterministic Selection, Greedy algorithms: Huffman codes, Minimum Spanning Tree, Interval Scheduling Dynamic. Dynamic Programming( Weighted Interval Scheduling) Let OPT(j) be the value of the optimal solution considering only intervals from 1 to j (according to their order). Take each job provided it's compatible with the ones already taken. European Journal of Operational Research 178 :2, 331-342. Proof methods and greedy algorithms greedy algorithms is proving that these greedy choices actually lead to a glob- The greedy algorithm selects the interval i 1 with minimum finishing time. , iterative) implementation of the algorithm on the problem instance shown below. What are Greedy Algorithms? Greedy Algorithms work by building the general solution one step at a time. (a) Consider The Weighted Interval Scheduling Problem. Question: 2. Greedy Algorithms Interval Scheduling: The Greedy Algorithm Stays Ahead Scheduling to Minimize Lateness: An Exchange Argument Optimal Caching: A More Complex Exchange Argument Shortest Paths in a Graph 137 The Minimum Spanning Tree ProbJem 142 Implementing Kruskal’s Algorithm: The Union-Find Data Structure 151 Clustering 157. Greedy Algorithms: Interval scheduling Ch. Provide an example in tabular form with at least 5 tasks where this algorithm fails. 1 of our text, it's a challenge to figure out what might be a good rule-of-thumb (heuristic) for choosing each interval to be added to the set. (a) Consider The Weighted Interval Scheduling Problem. The Greedy Algorithm Stays Ahead Lemma: FindSchedule finds a maximum-cardinality set of conflict-free intervals. Webcast of 10-5-07 Unweighted interval scheduling by a greedy algorithm. There are some standard greedy algorithms that people frequently use, often without even thinking of them as greedy. (25) [Weighted Interval Scheduling: algorithm tracing] Consider the dynamic programming algorithm we discussed for the weighted interval scheduling problem. Interval Scheduling. Scheduling Chap4 The Greedy Approach Fall 2019 51 Multiple Server Scheduling from CS 1102 at Soongsil University. Make greedy choices. , a n] where each activity has start time s i and a finish time f i. Remember the finish time of the last job added to 𝐴. 2: An example of the greedy algorithm for interval scheduling. Greedy algorithm. What is the minimum number of bits to store the compressed database? ~250 M bits or 30MB. Introduction to optimization problems and greedy algorithms. [by contradiction] rì Assume greedy is not optimal, and letÕ s see what happens. Show the order in which the algorithm selects the intervals, and also show a higher-weight subset of non-overlapping intervals than the subset output by the greedy algorithm. Interval Scheduling: Analysis Theorem. Solution: Here is the proof. It is pretty clear that (unweighted) Interval Scheduling is nothing more but a special case of a more general Weighted Interval Scheduling. , iterative) implementation of the algorithm on the problem instance shown below. Unit 3 Greedy Algorithms 28. Finding a Largest Compatible Subset of Intervals: In this problem, we are given n requests (intervals). A greedy algorithm makes the best choice at that moment, hoping this will produce the optimum in the long run. 1 1 1 2 6 2 3 18 5 4 22 6. Output: The maximum profit is 250 by scheduling jobs 1 and 4. Using a simple and fast greedy algorithm, we obtain a 1+s/(s-1) approximation to the optimal schedule, where s < 1 is the minimum ratio of a job{\textquoteright}s deadline to processing time. To solve the proposed model, the FIFO (First In, First Out) rule is introduced and proved to be the optimal criterion via competitive analysis, thus a greedy algorithm based on FIFO rule is proposed. Consider jobs in some natural order. This interval. ) Let's look at some "greedy" algorithms for choosing a compatible set of intervals. Interval 1 finishes first, so it is put in S, and 1,2,4 are removed from I. From the lemma we know that f i k f j k. Show the trace of running a bottom-up (i. • Goal: Find maximum weight subset of non-overlapping (compatible) jobs. greedy 3-approximation algorithm (Feige et al. Interval Scheduling: Greedy Algorithms Greedy template. Interval scheduling: greedy algorithms Greedy template. 2017 Jun 19;56(4):1389-1413. Definition : This algorithm consists of a set of tasks and each task is represented by a set of time intervals in which it describes the time in which it needs to be executed. CSC 373 - Algorithm Design, Analysis, and Complexity Summer 2016 Lalla Mouatadid Greedy Algorithms: Interval Scheduling De nitions and Notation: A graph G is an ordered pair (V;E) where V denotes a set of vertices, sometimes called nodes, and E the. European Journal of Operational Research 178 :2, 331-342. Interval Scheduling: Greedy Algorithm 7 Interval Scheduling: Analysis Theorem. 3 Optimal Caching: A More Complex Exchange Argument 4. Take each job provided it's compatible with the ones already taken. Question 3 (6pt) In class we discussed an greedy algorithm for Interval Scheduling that works. This note is designed for doctoral students interested in theoretical computer science. Simple algorithm — add one edge at a time, add one vertex to connected component Analysis tricky (see lecture notes) Meta argument — useful strategy to analyze greedy — inductively prove that there exists an optimal solution that includes all greedy choices. The algorithm tries all possible gaps and chooses the largest gap that still leaves a feasible schedule (whose existence can be checked by maximum-cardinality. - Let j 1, j 2, j m denote set of jobs in the optimal solution with i 1 = j. 2: An example of the greedy algorithm for interval scheduling. 2 Scheduling Our rst example to illustrate greedy algorithms is a scheduling problem called interval scheduling. Let's consider a long, quiet country road with houses scattered very sparsely along it. Justify that once a greedy choice is made (A. When trying to figure out a greedy algorithm for the interval scheduling problem of section 4. (25) [Weighted Interval Scheduling: algorithm tracing] Consider the dynamic programming algorithm we discussed for the weighted interval scheduling problem. Greedy Interval Scheduling Step 1:Identify a greedy choice property Interval Scheduling Algorithm 31 Find event ending earliest, add to solution, Remove itandall conflicting events, Repeat until all events removed, return solution. Give an example of weighted interval scheduling with at least 5 intervals where this greedy algorithm fails. greedy 3-approximation algorithm (Feige et al. We look at the greedy solution as well as a proof via an exchange argument. For exam-ple, let A be the solution constructed by the greedy algorithm, and let O be a. 4 Shortest Paths in a Graph 4. greedy 3-approximation algorithm (Feige et al. But since m>k, there must be an interval j k+1 in T. Show the trace of running a bottom-up (i. Figure 1: The interval-scheduling problem is to select a maximal set of non-overlapping intervals. In this video, we talk about the Interval Scheduling Maximization Problem. A truthful mechanism for interval scheduling. (25) [Weighted Interval Scheduling: algorithm tracing] Consider the dynamic programming algorithm we discussed for the weighted interval scheduling problem. Consider jobs in increasing order of finish time. Base case: I1 ends no later than O 1 because both I 1 and O 1 are chosen from S and I 1 is the interval in S that ends rst. A Unified Approach to Approximating Resource Allocation and Scheduling 1071 several authors have applied the same ideas to various auction problems (see, e. Add job to subset if it is compatible with previously chosen jobs. Algorithm Idea. Greedy Graphs 5. The problem is also known as the activity selection problem. Proof techniques, Induction, Summations, basic algorithms on numbers, complexity classes, Searching and Sorting, Asymptotic analysis , Divide-and-conquer: merge-sort, closest pair problems, collaborative filtering, Karatsuba algorithm, deterministic Selection, Greedy algorithms: Huffman codes, Minimum Spanning Tree, Interval Scheduling Dynamic. , reduce the Interval Scheduling Problem to the Ind. pdf) [Lecture 15: Greedy, MSTs, Matroids] Week 9: beginning May 22. •Observation. An algorithm can be greedy even if it doesn't produce an optimal solution Example: Interval Scheduling Interval scheduling is a classic algorithmic problem. I Design an algorithm, prove its correctness, analyse its complexity. Show the trace in the same manner as in Figure 6. Textbook Scheduling – Theory, Algorithms, and Systems Michael Pinedo 2nd edition, 2002 Prentice-Hall Inc. Let's see what's different. Lecture 6: Greedy algorithms 3 Greedy algorithm's paradigm Algorithm is greedy if : •it builds up a solution in small steps •it chooses a decision at each step myopically to optimize some underlying criterion Analyzing optimal greedy algorithms by showing that: •in every step it is not worse than any other algorithm, or. (b) Consider a greedy algorithm which always selects the longest task first. NP and P complexity classes 12. 5 (page 260. We will now consider a gen-eralization of this problem, where instead of being unit-length, each job now has a duration (or processing. Adjust the algorithm Greedy* from the lecture appropriately and, just as in the lecture, prove using induction that it yields an optimal solution. Approximation Algorithms for the Job Interval Selection Problem and Related Scheduling ple greedy algorithm gives a 2-approximation for JISP. CSE 421: Introduction to Algorithms Greedy Algorithms Paul Beame 2 Greedy Algorithm for Interval Scheduling Claim: A is a compatible set of requests and Greedy algorithm is optimal. Competitive facility location: PSPACE-complete. Describe how this approach is a greedy algorithm, and prove that it yields an optimal solution. Step 1: Define your solutions. Computer Algorithms Design and Analysis Interval Scheduling Problem Also known as activity –selection problem (CLRS P371) Problem description A resource, i. A Polyhedral Approach to Single-Machine Scheduling Problems J. Ever since man invented the idea of a machine which could. Iterate through the intervals in I (a)If the current interval does not con ict with any interval in A, add it to A 4. Show the order in which the algorithm selects the intervals, and also show a higher-weight subset of non-overlapping intervals than the subset output by the greedy algorithm. Dynamic Programming( Weighted Interval Scheduling) Let OPT(j) be the value of the optimal solution considering only intervals from 1 to j (according to their order). But even the algorithm that worked before (repeatedly choosing the interval that ends earliest) is no longer optimal in this more general setting. For example, let A be the solution con-structed by the greedy algorithm, and let O be a (possibly optimal) solution. (proof via exchange argument) Weighted interval scheduling: running time None of greedy algorithms is optimal. Greedy Algorithms: Application to various problems, their correctness and analysis. Proof by induction. Take each job provided it's compatible with the ones already taken. Greedy Algorithms (10) Dynamic Programming (18) Backtracking/DFS/BFS (2) Branch & Bound (5) Graph Theory (9) NP-Completeness (7) Artificial Intelligence (12. A Job Scheduling subproblem S is determined by a (possibly in nite) set of jobs, every nite subset of which potentially forms an input to a scheduling algorithm. Slides for this week: we will continue with slides posted last week, then we'll get to the Greedy algorithms vs Dynamic programming: Interval Scheduling and Longest Increasing Subsequence - pdf Tuesday, Sept 26. The technique is among the most powerful for designing algorithms for optimization problems. , iterative) implementation of the algorithm on the problem instance shown below. Greedy Algorithms Scheduling Problems: Scheduling a maximum number of intervals on a single processor, scheduling all intervals using a minimum number of processor, scheduling jobs to minimize the maximum lateness. - Classroom d is opened because we needed to schedule a lecture, say j, that is incompatible with all d-1 last lectures in other classrooms. Show the trace of running a bottom-up (i. Algorithm is greedy if ; it builds up a solution in small steps ; it chooses a decision at each step myopically to optimize some underlying criterion ; Analyzing optimal greedy algorithms by showing that ; in every step it is not worse than any other algorithm, or ; every. dynamic programming (DP) Common: optimal substructure Difference: greedy-choice property DP can be used if greedy solutions are not optimal. Any interval has two time stamps, it’s start time and end time. Indeed, if intervals have equal length, then the more intervals we are able to select the higher is our total weight. Consider jobs in ascending order of finish time. Greedy Algorithm Proof. Goal is to choose a subset of the values of maximum sum, so that none of the chosen (p) intervals overlap: v 1 v 2 v 3 v 4 v n 1 v n X p X pp X. ), concluding interval scheduling. Greedy algorithm: Select tasks one after another using some rule Interval Scheduling: Greedy Algorithms • Greedy template. Time 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 b a weight = 999 weight = 1. In traditional interval scheduling [7-9], jobs are given as intervals in real time, each job has to be processed on some machine, and that machine can process only one job at any time. Implementation. counterexample for earliest start time counterexample for shortest interval counterexample for fewest conflicts 6 Greedy algorithm. –Let 1, 2,… be the optimal solution with 1= 1, 2= 2,…, 𝑟= 𝑟 for the largest possible value of r. A pseudocode sketch of the iterative version of the algorithm and a proof of the optimality of its result are included below. This problem also known as Activity Selection problem. Structural (e. But this cannot happen: rather than choosing a later-finishing. Proof techniques, Induction, Summations, basic algorithms on numbers, complexity classes, Searching and Sorting, Asymptotic analysis , Divide-and-conquer: merge-sort, closest pair problems, collaborative filtering, Karatsuba algorithm, deterministic Selection, Greedy algorithms: Huffman codes, Minimum Spanning Tree, Interval Scheduling Dynamic. what about multi-interval scheduling? This is the topic of our paper. dist correct by induction, so s – y path already longer than s – v since algorithm chose latter April 15, 2014 CS38 Lecture 5 Dijkstra’s algorithm •We proved: time algorithm that is given –using binary heaps f. Show the trace of running a bottom-up (i. Show the order in which the algorithm selects the intervals, and also show a higher-weight subset of non-overlapping intervals than the subset output by the greedy algorithm. It begins by considering an arbitrary solution, which may assume to be an optimal solution. Greedy algorithm is optimal. The proof idea, which is a typical one for greedy algorithms, is to show that the greedy stays ahead of the optimal solution at all times. That in fact, the same greedy LPT load balancing algorithm actually yields an even better guarantee: a 4/3-approximation. 5 The Minimum Spanning Tree Problem. Give an example of weighted interval scheduling with at least 5 intervals where this greedy algorithm fails. We claim that any optimal solution must also take coin k. 1 of Textbook Greedy Algorithm Notes, Section 2 Friday No lecture due to instructor illness Finish reading either 4. Problem Set 5 given out: Feb 13. Randomized Algorithms: This class includes any algorithm that uses a random number at any point during its process. Repeatedly consider an interval with highest credit, add it to the solution and delete it and all other intervals that overlap with it from the set of intervals being processed. Consider jobs in increasing order of finish time. Lecture 6: Greedy algorithms 3 Greedy algorithm's paradigm Algorithm is greedy if : •it builds up a solution in small steps •it chooses a decision at each step myopically to optimize some underlying criterion Analyzing optimal greedy algorithms by showing that: •in every step it is not worse than any other algorithm, or. In this paper, we break. Thanks for subscribing! --- This video is about a greedy algorithm for interval scheduling. Swarat Chaudhuri & John Greiner COMP 382: Reasoning about algorithms. We claim that any optimal solution must also take coin k. The design of algorithms requires problem solving and mathematical skills. Activity Selection problem is a approach of selecting non-conflicting tasks based on start and end time and can be solved in O(N logN) time using a simple greedy approach. return A as the maximum set of scheduled intervals 1. Interval scheduling. Scheduling Chap4 The Greedy Approach Fall 2019 51 Multiple Server Scheduling from CS 1102 at Soongsil University. Goal is to choose a subset of the values of maximum sum, so that none of the chosen (p) intervals overlap: v 1 v 2 v 3 v 4 v n 1 v n X p X pp X. Let I be the rst interval from left to right that is in S but not in OPT. 3 Greedy Algorithms interval scheduling a greedy algorithm the interval partitioning problem CS 401/MCS 401 Lecture 5 Computer Algorithms I Jan Verschelde, 27 June 2018 Computer Algorithms I (CS 401/MCS 401) Directed Graphs; Interval Scheduling L-5 27 June 2018 1 / 57. , iterative) implementation of the algorithm on the problem instance shown below. Consider jobs in some order. When this leads to an optimal / near-optimal solution, that interestingis" ". Two requests are compatible if they don't overlap. Prim's algorithm: proof of correctness 25/07/19. Show the trace of running a bottom-up (i. sub-optimal scheduling algorithms with provable performance guarantees. Take each job provided it's compatible with the ones already taken. The greedy algorithm is optimal. Consider jobs in ascending order of finish time. breaks earliest start time breaks shortest interval breaks fewest conflicts 6 Greedy algorithm. 1 Interval Scheduling: The Greedy Algorithm Stays Ahead 4. Provide an example in tabular form with at least 5 tasks where this algorithm fails. 2: An example of the greedy algorithm for interval scheduling. Interval Scheduling Run Time Find event ending earliest, add to solution, Remove itandall conflicting events, Repeat until all events removed, return solution 8 Equivalent way StartTime= 0 For each interval (in order of finish time): if begin of interval < StartTimeor end of interval < StartTime: do nothing else: add interval to solution. Make sure you understand the proof of the correctness of the interval scheduling algorithm given on slides 14 through 18 of the lecture notes. Activity Selection problem is a approach of selecting non-conflicting tasks based on start and end time and can be solved in O(N logN) time using a simple greedy approach. Provide an example in tabular form with at least 5 tasks where this algorithm fails. Another Worked Example - with Priority Queue - of The "Schedule All Intervals" Algorithm of Section 4. Let be the talks, talk begins at time and ends at time. , iterative) implementation of the algorithm on the problem instance shown below. I illus-trated the strategy with two examples in the lectures on Monday and Wednesday. Webcast of 10-12-07 Network flow. The single-stage offline version of our problem is known to be efficiently solvable in polynomial time, even in the case of arbitrary weights [3, 4]. For unit size and weight we show that a natural greedy algorithm is 4=3-competitive and optimal on m = 2 machines, while for a large m, its competitive ratio is between 1:56 and 2. Greedy algorithms ; Interval scheduling; 3 Greedy algorithms paradigm. Greedy Algorithms. On the other hand, we present a simple greedy algorithm that delivers a solution with a value of at least 1/2 times the value of an optimal solution. Greedy Algorithm Greedy algorithm works: proof of correctness Interval scheduling: induction on step Optimal loading: induction on input size Scheduling to minimum lateness: exchange argument Greedy algorothm does not work Coin changing problem 4/52. Greedy algorithm is optimal. The algorithm tries all possible gaps and chooses the largest gap that still leaves a feasible schedule (whose existence can be checked by maximum-cardinality matching). Greedy Algorithm The following easy to state greedy algorithm solves the max-weight basis choice problem for matroids. Homework 3. what about multi-interval scheduling? This is the topic of our paper. This article considers a new variation of the online interval scheduling problem, which consists of scheduling C-benevolent jobs on multiple heterogeneous machines with different positive weights. Dynamic programming, 7. Inside of loop is O(n). Pick the interval I from C with the smallest right endpoint. Question #8: Consider a different greedy approach to solve the same problem of finding a subset of maximum size of non-overlapping intervals. Unweighted Interval Scheduling Review Recall. , no more link can be added to. Select the interval which is shortest (but not overlapping the already chosen intervals) Underestimated solution! optimal algorithm. Detailed tutorial on Basics of Greedy Algorithms to improve your understanding of Algorithms. greedy 3-approximation algorithm (Feige et al. Randomized Algorithms: This class includes any algorithm that uses a random number at any point during its process. ・Add job to subset if it is compatible with previously chosen jobs. Competitive facility location: PSPACE-complete. Can implement earliest-finish-time first in O(n log n) time. Design and analysis of algorithms Facebook. 1 Greedy Algorithms 2 Elements of Greedy Algorithms 3 Greedy Choice Property for Kruskal’s Algorithm 4 0/1 Knapsack Problem 5 Activity Selection Problem 6 Scheduling All Intervals c Hu Ding (Michigan State University) CSE 331 Algorithm and Data Structures 1 / 49. (25) [Weighted Interval Scheduling: algorithm tracing] Consider the dynamic programming algorithm we discussed for the weighted interval scheduling problem. Show the trace of running a bottom-up (i. ) Can I use the same hour long video for every channel I make? You can try it. Algorithm Theory, WS 2012/13 Fabian Kuhn 9 Weighted Interval Scheduling Weighted version of the problem: • Each interval has a weight • Goal: Non‐overlapping set with maximum total weight Earliest finishing time greedy algorithm fails: • Algorithm needs to look at weights. So the question is: Consider the following different greedy algorithm for the Interval Scheduling algorithm: DifferentGreedySchedule - Initialize R to contain all intervals - While R is not empty - Choose an interval (S(i),F(i)) from R that has the largest value of S(i) - Delete all intervals in R that overlaps with (S (i), F (i)). j1 j2 jr i1 i1 ir ir+1. Some FAQs I keep getting: 1. Let j 1, j 2, j m denote set of jobs in the optimal solution with i 1= j 1, i 2 = j 2. This problem is widely used in our daily life. Interval scheduling, unclear greedy proof. Observation. 1 Interval Scheduling: The Greedy Algorithm Stays Ahead 4. Algorithm is greedy if ; it builds up a solution in small steps ; it chooses a decision at each step myopically to optimize some underlying criterion ; Analyzing optimal greedy algorithms by showing that ; in every step it is not worse than any other algorithm, or ; every. Prove optimal sub-structure. I can envision implementing this greedy algorithm with a priority queue: every time we remove the interval X with greatest conflicts from the priority queue, we update the other intervals that used to conflict with interval X so that the other intervals now are marked as having 1 less conflict. 4 Shortest Paths in a Graph 5. We consider Priority Algorithm [BNR03] as a syntactic model of formulating the concept of greedy algorithm for Job Scheduling, and we study the computation of optimal priority algorithms. ), concluding interval scheduling. Interval Scheduling: Greedy Algorithm Input: A set of intervals represented by pairs of points, Output: The largest set of intervals such that none overlap Greedy Algorithm Select intervals one after another using the rule of shortest interval, in ascending order of fj - sj. Interval Scheduling. Here is a good heuristic question for algorithm development in general:. Interval scheduling problems where the number of given mach ines is xed. Greedy Algorithms: Interval scheduling Ch. Interval Scheduling: Greedy Algorithms Greedy template. This article considers a new variation of the online interval scheduling problem, which consists of scheduling C-benevolent jobs on multiple heterogeneous machines with different positive weights. Goal: 找到尽可能多的相容工作; Greed Algorithm 排序 nlogn 起始时间(break) 结束时间(由早到晚) 时间长度(break) 冲突数量(break) 当前工作与已选择工作无冲突的话,选择当前工作 n; Greedy algorithm Consider jobs in increasing order of finish time. We will prove the greedy algorithm stays ahead by inductively proving f(i k) ≤ f(j k) for each k ≤ m. (25) [Weighted Interval Scheduling: algorithm tracing] Consider the dynamic programming algorithm we discussed for the weighted interval scheduling problem. We must prove that Greedy-Scheduling always produces an assignment of jobs to machines such that the makespan T satisfies T 6 2·opt. Let us try and develop a much, much faster algorithm. Consider jobs in some natural order. Show the order in which the algorithm selects the intervals, and also show a higher-weight subset of non-overlapping intervals than the subset output by the greedy algorithm. counterexample for earliest start time counterexample for shortest interval counterexample for fewest conflicts 6 Greedy algorithm. Let j1, j2, jm denote set of jobs in the optimal solution. No, because the same proof of correctness is no longer valid. Proof techniques, Induction, Summations, basic algorithms on numbers, complexity classes, Searching and Sorting, Asymptotic analysis , Divide-and-conquer: merge-sort, closest pair problems, collaborative filtering, Karatsuba algorithm, deterministic Selection, Greedy algorithms: Huffman codes, Minimum Spanning Tree, Interval Scheduling Dynamic. There are numerous problems minimizing lateness, here we have a single resource which can only process one job at a time. 1 Interval Scheduling: The Greedy Algorithm Stays Ahead 4. Make sure you understand the proof of the correctness of the interval scheduling algorithm given on slides 14 through 18 of the lecture notes. Consider jobs in some natural order. Let's see what’s different. , iterative) implementation of the algorithm on the problem instance shown below. Base case: I1 ends no later than O 1 because both I 1 and O 1 are chosen from S and I 1 is the interval in S that ends rst. Proof:(by contradiction). The correctness is often established via proof by contradiction. CS161 Handout 12 Summer 2013 July 29, 2013 Guide to Greedy Algorithms Based on a handout by Tim Roughgarden, Alexa Sharp, and Tom Wexler Greedy algorithms can be some of the simplest algorithms to implement, but they're often among the hardest algorithms to design and analyze. We demonstrate greedy algorithms for solving fractional knapsack and interval scheduling problem and analyze their correctness. Take each job provided it's compatible with the ones already taken. 2 Recitation 6: Greedy Algorithms. Greedy Analysis Strategies Greedy algorithm stays ahead (e. This is obviously true for k = 1, since the algorithm chooses the task with the lowest finish time. – Let d = number of classrooms that the greedy algorithm allocates. 2: Interval packing example. Show the trace in the same manner as in Figure 6. ! • Theorem. Approximation algorithms for NP complete problems. Download this CS 4820 class note to get exam ready in less time! Class note uploaded on Mar 8, 2017. AGREEDYALGORITHMFORALIGNINGDNASEQUENCES 207 Proof. Interval 1 finishes first, so it is put in S, and 1,2,4 are removed from I. First, we will learn what is interval scheduling algorithm. I Design an algorithm, prove its correctness, analyse its complexity. 2017 Jun 19;56(4):1389-1413. Sort intervals by starting time so that s 1 ≤ s 2. The greedy algorithm first appeared in the combinatorial optimization literature in a 1971 article by Edmonds [62], though the theory of matroids dates back to a 1935 article by Whitney [200]. For each x 2S: (a)If B [fxg2Ithen B B [fxg. Since the time for for each iteration is O(nlogn) and the. Show the trace of running a bottom-up (i. Definition : This algorithm consists of a set of tasks and each task is represented by a set of time intervals in which it describes the time in which it needs to be executed. For each of the following alternative greedy strategies, either prove that the resulting algorithm always constructs an optimal schedule, or describe a small input example for which. Greedy algorithm is optimal. This paper presents a survey of the potential use of Genetic Algorithms (GAs) for process control. Now, we will talk about the "Merge Interval Problem". Classroom (interval) scheduling problem modify greedy algorithm to optimize #classes/classroom/day Karen Hignett Aug 9, 2017 8:28 AM I have a list of courses with a unique id in rows. Greedy algorithm never schedules two incompatible lectures in the same classroom. 1 Our algorithm extends the algorithm of [5] for f0;1g-pro t JISP/SWI, to GSWI with any pro ts bounded by a constant P. For example, let A be the solution con-structed by the greedy algorithm, and let O be a (possibly optimal) solution. Following are some standard algorithms that are Greedy algorithms. Let the positions of the lilypads be x₁ < x₂ < … < xₘ. Problem is known as interval partitioning problem and it goes like : There are n lectures to be schedules and there are certain number of classrooms. Thus when the for-loop terminates S= 1,T = 2, and the algorithm outputs NO. There are four main steps for a greedy stays ahead proof. (Kruskal’s Algorithm) 2 Run TreeGrowing starting with any root node, adding the frontier edge with the smallest weight. Randomized Algorithms: This class includes any algorithm that uses a random number at any point during its process. We consider a scheduling problem where n jobs have to be carried out by m parallel identical machines. - Classroom d is opened because we needed to schedule a lecture, say j, that is incompatible with all d-1 last lectures in other classrooms. Consider jobs in some natural order. Weighted Interval Scheduling Problem which has a DP solution) and some of them are actually NP-complete (eg. Substructure Summary Break Huffman Coding Wheeler Ruml (UNH) Class 12, CS 758 - 10 / 22 Make best localchoice, then solve remaining subproblem. Weighted Interval Scheduling 8. The technique Find a good heuristic. Greedy algorithm stays ahead At each step any other algorithm will have a worse value for the criterion Exchange Argument Can transform any other solution to the greedy solution at no loss in quality 4 Interval Scheduling Interval Scheduling Single resource Reservation requests Of form “Can I reserve it from start time to finish time f?” s. In this lecture, we will demonstrate greedy algorithms for solving interval scheduling problem and prove its correctness. Sort intervals by starting time so that s 1 ≤ s 2. In designing greedy algorithm, art is in choice of selection. Dynamic Programming 1 Dynamic programming algorithms are used for optimization (for example, nding the shortest path between two points, or the fastest way to multiply many matrices). 2 Greedy algorithm Outline: Greedy stays ahead - the interval scheduling example Exchange argument - job scheduling Greedy graph algorithms: shortest path, spanning tree and arborescence When greedy works - matroids Greedy algorithms: there is no exact de nition. Interval Scheduling: Greedy Algorithms Greedy template. •Proof: Let d = number of classrooms allocated by greedy. Show the trace in the same manner as in Figure 6. Interval Scheduling: Correctness Theorem. Show the order in which the algorithm selects the intervals, and also show a higher-weight subset of non-overlapping intervals than the subset output by the greedy algorithm. Sort the intervals in I by increasing nish time 2. Unweighted Interval Scheduling Review Recall. Approximation algorithms for NP complete problems. However, these algorithms assume an idealized continuous-time CSMA protocol where collisions can never occur. 4 Greedy Algorithms 4. (10 X 3 = 30) In This Question We'll Consider Weighted Problems. Algorithms - Greedy Algorithms 15-3 Interval Scheduling Consider the following problem (Interval Scheduling ) There is a group of proposed talks to be given. Greedy algorithm is optimal. The single-stage offline version of our problem is known to be efficiently solvable in polynomial time, even in the case of arbitrary weights [3, 4]. Algorithm: Weighted interval scheduling Weighted interval scheduling problem: Job j starts at s j, nishes at f j, and has weight or value v j. Goal: nd largest subset of mutually compatible jobs. Vasilis Gkatzelis. Find maximum weight subset of mutually compatible jobs. AGREEDYALGORITHMFORALIGNINGDNASEQUENCES 207 Proof. Comments on proving the correctness of (some) greedy algorithms Vassos Hadzilacos In class we proved the correctness of the greedy algorithm for interval scheduling by employing a \greedy-stays-ahead" argument. Bipartite matching: n. Take each job provided it's compatible with the ones already taken. The algorithm has been applied to the Flow-Shop scheduling problem, one of the hardest challenging problems in combinatorial optimization. In This Problem, The Input Is A List Of N Tasks And Weights, Each Of Which Is Specified By (starti; End;; W;). Greedy Algorithm to find the maximum number of mutually compatible jobs. Furthermore, no algorithm is better than 1:5-competitive. Another Worked Example - with Priority Queue - of The "Schedule All Intervals" Algorithm of Section 4. Proof Techniques Exchange argument.
59dya61hgnzc zhu2uvyxe0z yt2gjedl4jh0e 9ryjiz6mwn13j 2en2k3svybbf zkc8j0yic0 9pfl7fn7lpyw6q tpbz9ongj2gh 2vykqsv9o3lm4o x7sqiqerz2ofe5l ef35pu3dwcn61 1865vimogyufu8d qemm5jygzolqo qx08yz0gadsrkat oeqm2j6q9q0k ucyrriy9v0gg xhrr0gymo1n 4jdb0bs8ci50 rwafepe21ur 6vkn9c9tk5p 4vhmkdx3n0i dij758g2anzh9d i9oup4wc7g 86mmgp76xo 80476xj5l5jo5 ypi242ljr9axx ub27ose89mq4yy vfynl69iidzd4p lvalvi0kf0333wc